Collaboration part 2

One of the first big breaks I had as a TV commercial director was shooting a Windex commercial. It came about very fast- another director was supposed to do it, but I got the call on a Saturday morning and we shot the following Thursday. Casting was Monday and Tuesday, we built a set Tuesday and Wednesday and shot Thursday while the paint was still wet. We transferred film on Friday and it was cut and finished the following Tuesday.

It’s a spot many of you have seen. A man and a woman are cleaning windows, she is using Windex and the man is using “the other leading brand.” Her window gets so clean, the plant growing between them bends over to the cleaner window. Hilarity ensues and viewers race to the store to buy more Windex.

As a filmmaker and a film watcher I really like to believe what I see with my own eyes. I don’t really care for Special FX and in these days of green screen and computers it is very easy to create a new reality. So, when it came time to make the plant move, I wanted to make a real plant, really move. I didn’t want some sort of rigged animatronic plant. I had no idea how to do this (see the posts above about my lack of technical skills) but the beauty of working on a film set is that if you hire the right people, someone will be able to figure it out.

Enter Jeff Renfro, an otherwise unremarkable grip, gaffer, and handyman. After lots of discussion with the ad agency, the producer, Jim and anyone else with two cents, Jeff suggested the simplest of all solutions- fishing line. We strung two pieces of line to the plants, sat off camera and on cue gave it a tug and like magic the plant moved to the clean window. After about three takes Jeff added a change. He pulled the taller branch over first, waited a beat and then pulled the lower part towards him. When they added the music, it was just the right extra beat and chuckle the spot needed.

I would like to say it was great direction that made this happen, but the truth is it was, as always, a collaborative venture. We had worked with Jeff enough to know what he could do, and he was comfortable enough to come up with the simple solution while everyone around him was over thinking the problem. While just doing his job, he made me look good.

Thanks Jeff.

PeterH

Collaboration

I am going to devote a few posts to collaboration. I think too many young filmmakers feel the need to do everything themselves- write, shoot, produce, direct, edit. But that’s not how good films are made. Films are made by people with a diverse range of talents coming together to contribute their own piece of the puzzle. The group is stronger than any individual member. (This is probably why we have never had a great Ringo Starr or Charlie Watts solo album.)

I tell students they do not have to know how to do everything, they just have to develop
the language to get what they want. This is often a hard lesson to learn and with the advances in technology sometimes I feel it is an uphill battle because it is so much easier for a beginning filmmaker to be a one-man band.

In one of my first posts I described how Jim and I began working together. He was shooting a TV commercial for a production company I worked for and he saw the longer form version of Denny Dent. He liked it and suggested I edit it to 30 seconds. He invited me to his home a few days later to cut it and we have been working together ever since.

That was 15 years ago.

Our collaboration could have easily lasted only a few hours but we hit it off right away and together we were better than apart. We had enough in common as filmmakers (how we approach an edit or shooting a job- we always look to tell a story) that we didn’t have to reinvent the filmmaking wheel. Jim takes on pieces of the puzzle like shooting, lead editor and even billing, that I couldn’t do as well as he does and I write, conceptualize and schmooze with the clients. Together we somehow make it work.

Over the next few posts I am going to share some stories about key crew members who have made very subtle, yet very important contributions to projects we have worked on. My hope is that you will see how collaboration makes the work better.

PeterH

iphone

Everyone who knows me, knows I am all about the latest and greatest technology. I must have the fastest computer, the most gadgets and toys, and be connected to the internet all the time. I just can’t get enough.

That noise you all just heard is everyone who knows me laughing their heads off because in reality I am a Luddite. Sure, I have a computer- a pretty good one, though a couple of years old- and I know how to surf the web, but that’s about it. Jim covers me technology-wise at work, the IT guys at school and teaching assistants in the classroom.

So, with that as a preamble, I got an iphone over the weekend and it’s pretty cool, especially for a boring old guy like myself. I have barely scratched the surface of what it can do but here is a mini-review. Aesthetically it is great. A little smaller than I imagined, a black front with a silver back. A nice weight to it. Functionally it was very easy to set up and get going. There are hardly any instructions I just followed my nose.

I heard about problems with the keyboard- it’s not tactile- but it wasn’t an issue for me. There is a smart function so when I typed Windu for Windy, it corrected me. The internet was great. A few button pushes and I was on the Windy Cine website watching our demo reel in the middle of the park. A few more pushes later I was reading this blog. It wasn’t DSL fast, but middle of the park connected to nothing, on my phone it was plenty fast.

I haven’t played with the ipod or the video functions yet, I need to update my operating system first, but the biggest drawback so far is the ATT network. Its reach is not as good as other providers. My other concern is that I don’t get carried away with surfing the net as I drive down Lake Shore Drive. I can see the headline now, “Dumb filmmaker101 kills himself while Googling himself.”

PeterH

Mistakes- part 3

I was going to title this post- Mistakes- Finale, but I know myself and there will be more mistakes in my future so stay tuned.

What follows is a series of random errors, mistakes and goofs I have made over 20+ years of being a filmmaker. No one was seriously hurt in the process and we all lived to shoot film another day.

1) Someway, somehow I convinced Chicago’s big camera rental house to give 20-year old me a crane -for free- for the weekend. This is a huge and expensive piece of gear, and potentially dangerous to operate. Day 1, we got it stuck in the mud. Day 2, when empty it crashed to the ground. Day 3, we had to move the truck it was delivered on outdoors. (We were shooting on a stage and had brought it inside.) We left the windows open, an ice storm ensued and at 6am we are chiseling ice off the front seat, steering wheel and dashboard of the vehicle. At 9:00 it was back at the camera shop no worse for wear.

2) I left a 12 foot by 12 foot silk and metal frame on the ground in a park for two days. How we didn’t remember to pick it up is beyond me. When Stephan and I returned gear two days later the man said, “Where’s the 12 by?” Without missing a beat Stephan said, “Oh, we returned it to the other place by mistake.” We ran out of there and hauled ass back to the suburbs, and there, where we left it two days earlier was our silk.

3) In a big scene in Victimless Crimes– when the bad guy cop comes and interviews our leading lady- there is a big roll of gaffer’s tape right in plain sight. It only took me 30 or 40 viewings in the editing room to notice it, yet other people see it right away. I try to pass it off as set decoration, but who has 2-inch roll of gaffers tape sitting in their living room.

4) After a long night shooting a music video I had to get on a plane for L.A. This was pre-internet, pre-cell phone. I walked from the set with about $900 of petty cash in my pocket. The producer, who was from out of town and didn’t know me, thought I stole it and for 3 days wanted me arrested.

5) For my student film, The Law of Inertia, I borrowed a Vespa. I convinced a frat boy to loan it to me and not 15 seconds after I took possession, I wiped out and scraped the side. (Scraped me pretty good too, but that’s another story.) I copped to the offense and he let me off the hook.

I am sure there are more, these are the goofs that popped into my mind recently.

PeterH

Updates

I just wanted to add some details to some recent posts. Yesterday, I talked about the student film I produced which had a great title sequence and not much else. There is a happy ending. The director, David Zucker, is a successful writer, producer and executive in Los Angeles. He worked for Warner Brothers and and CBS, was instrumental in getting E.R. on the air, and has written for television. He is currently and executive with Jerry Bruckheimer’s company.

The lead actress in that film and Miss Illinois 1985 is Karen Moncrief. Today, Karen is better known as a writer and director. Her 2002 film, Blue Car,premiered at Sundance. She recently directed a film with Toni Colette and Piper Laurie called Dead Girl.

The director of Stage Door/Stonehenge, Ricky Posner is a film producer. He produced among other things, Tie Me Up Tie Me Down, the Pedro Almodovar film and many others.

Last week I wrote a post called Quid Pro Quo- about the favor bank. Thank you for your comments. The former student I featured at the end of the post called me the other day (evidently he doesn’t read this page) asking for a favor. I helped him out on a billing issue he had with a client.

We do all learn from our mistakes.

PeterH

Mistakes- part 2

A few months after my “Stage Door/Stonehenge” experience I produced another student film. The plot was simple, a man and a woman worked together, had a little spat, she gets a phone call, gets upset and leaves the office. The man, thinking it was something he did, follows her. As the producer I was charged with two big tasks. Find a field where the man and woman could have their big scene, and figure out how to light it- faking moonlight.

We spent the summer searching for the right location. We finally found one where we could do an electrical tie-in to the nearest house – the home owner was an alumni of our school, and we offered him a cameo in the film, in exchange for pulling power from his house all night long. (This is a good example of two things I have mentioned in recent posts Quid Pro Quo- we put him in the film for the use of his electricity and the flattery gets you everywhere principle. We buttered him up knowing what a nightmare it would be for him to have us esssentially in his backyard all night long. His ego did the rest for us.)

After we secured the location we had to figure out how to fake moonlight. We didn’t have the budget for a crane and a 20,000 watt HMI light, so we decided to erect scaffolding and hang every light we could from it, then put a giant silk in front of the structure to lose the overlapping shadows. It worked.

Shooting comes and it all works out well. It was a hellish schedule, shoot all Friday night, wrap about 5am, start at 11am the next morning in the architects’ office, then return to the field to shoot the rest of the shots. (We had students camp out in the field to secure the lights and scaffolding.) Anything we don’t get we pick up Sunday or Sunday night. Your basic low-budget film shoot- we worked 65 of 72 hours over the weekend and then went to class on Monday.

So, what’s the problem? Here’s the problem… the film stinks. It looks great and I didn’t even tell you about the title sequence we created with architectural renderings- best opening titles of any student film I have ever seen. The film goes down hill from there. Here, again, are the lowlights of the film:

1) Casting. We cast two 20 years old to be architects. It doesn’t work, never will.
2) Story. What seemed like a mystery, this phone call, the catalyst for the whole film, was just confusing.
3) The ending. A common response to the film was “What happened?” It’s not a good thing when you need to take 10 minutes to explain your five minute film.
4) The time line of the film. It starts in the day at the office and when they leave and go to the field, it’s night. As Fred Willard says in A Mighty Wind, “Wha Happened?”
5) Why do they walk through a field anyway? Suddenly the film becomes about her taking a short cut?

When it was all said and down we had a nicely produced, good looking, well executed shiny turd of a film on our hands. Live and Learn. Remember it’s about the story, not the color-coded organization system or lighting a field. I wish I had focused on the script and asked a simple question- why this?

PeterH

Mistakes- part 1

As a young filmmaker I learned the most from those projects that didn’t turn out so well and I think that’s probably the case for most people. For the next couple of posts I am going to share some of those mistakes and the lessons learned from them.

In the dead of winter my junior year of college I was the production manager on a student film. The film was called Stage Door and it was about an old actor who returns to the theater of his youth. There, he is haunted by ghosts and the vision of a woman who represents something-I never did figure out what.

I took the job because a) the director liked me and wanted me to work on it (flattery gets you everywhere) and b) the idea of taking a week off of my 9am Russian Lit. class in mid-January was very appealing. c) I was impressed by the director because he had a real production strip board, something I had never seen before. He had some sort of color-coded organization system, which I never quite figured out. If it was red it meant something, black something else, blue yet another thing. It was all too much for me as I was used to working with crumpled pieces of notepaper shoved into my pockets.

I was also impressed because he had a budget of $15,000, which was a lot of money in 1985 for a student film. My thinking was with that sort of dough AND a color-coded strip board how could it be a bad film.

What follows is a series of the lowlights of the week.

1) On one of the coldest January’s on record we shoot outside for four hours. The camera batteries froze, the lens fogged from running inside and out, and after about two hours someone stopped keeping track of how much film we shot, so we ran out. We spent two hours outdoors in the cold go through the motions of shooting but getting absolutely.
2) My roommate, Craig, was drafted to be one of the “Ghosts.” He was given an 8am call time and put in this heavy white make up- something out of Kabuki Theater. At 1pm he still hadn’t shot, so he went to class to take an exam in full costume and make up. He was really pissed (and reminds me to this day). At 2am we finally shot his scene, which consisted of him kicking the prone body of the lead actor as we tilted down from his Kabuki face to his Jack Boots. He was in make up for 18 hours for this.
3) After two days we move inside the theater where the director wants a shot from the back of the theater with the stage lit by a single bare light bulb. When he is informed we cannot do this because of a lack of exposure, the director insists we try it. An hour later we show him the set up and he agrees it is no good. He forces us to use every light available to us to make his “vision” work. Three hours and many blown fuses later we shoot the scene. It lasts all of 4 seconds in the final cut of the film.
4) The director was determined to use red letters for the title sequence. They bled all over the place so the title of the film looked like “stonehenge.”
5) The director submitted the film to the student academy awards in the narrative category. The academy shifted it to the experimental category.

Lessons learned:

1) Money and color-coded strip boards mean nothing, story is everything.
2) Never use red for your title sequence.
3) Communicate your vision to everyone well in advance.
4) The director decided to become a production designer instead of a filmmaker.
5) I met Stephan Fopeano, one of my best friends and future collaborator. (He brought coffee.)
6) Don’t blow off a week of Russian Lit. I ended up getting a D.

PeterH

An Old Guy Named Peter

If, like me, you like old guys named Peter who enjoy a drink or three and are charming, witty and flirtatious then you will probably like the film Venus. Peter O’Toole basically plays Peter O’Toole, an actor nearing the end of his days, who develops a relationship with his best friend’s grand-niece, a 20-something country girl. Think Pygmalion with a few fingers of whiskey and a nice little role for Vanessa Redgrave.

I have always liked Peter O’Toole and Richard Harris and those English/Irish actors who were steeped in the classics, yet can do broad comedy. To me American male movie stars are boring and one dimensional, but just look at O’Toole, add a cigarette and a cocktail and let him go. Does Tom Cruise compare?

Another reason to see Venus is that you just don’t get many films about older people dealing (or not dealing) with their mortality. Wrestling Ernest Hemingway with Robert Duvall and Richard Harris is well worth seeing for just that reason. In that film Richard Harris basically plays Richard Harris who uses Robert Duvall as his foil. It’s fun and features Sandra Bullock in one of her first film roles.

See both films and you won’t be disappointed. Then imagine which American actor could play those roles and get back to me.

PeterH

Special Olympics

Four years ago today, June 21, 2003, I was with my family in Dublin, Ireland for the opening ceremonies of the 2003 International Special Olympic World Games. My sister, Mary Beth, was competing for the United States team as a bowler.

It was the first time the world games had been held outside of the United States. This year they will be in China. While there I made the film, what’s two +three? about our experience growing up with Mary Beth. For those of you interested in knowing more about the film, click on the link on the right side of the page. This post is mostly here to share moments that didn’t make news in the U.S.

The World Games brought together 5,000 athletes and 30,000 family members from around the world. It was the biggest conference ever held in Ireland. The opening ceremonies attended by 70,000 people was the highest rated TV show in Ireland ever. 10 days later the closing ceremonies became their second highest rated TV program. Each night on TV there was an hour long recap of the days events and you couldn’t lift a pint of Guiness without running into Pierce Brosnan or Colin Farrell.

Across the country and into Northern Ireland (the U.S. team spent a week in Belfast prior to the opening ceremonies, and then had a parade at Disney World on their return) the Irish people reached out to athletes. Many times we would be in a restaurant and spontaneous cheering would erupt because a Special Olympian had entered. I remember wishing we could capture that spirit and bring it back to the states,where we were a few months into a war that continues.

Some personal highlights:

1) Bono, Nelson Mandela, my sister and Muhammed Ali being at the same place at the same time.

2) Realizing that as a country Ireland had to build a natatorium- a fancy word for a swimming pool- for the games as well as a bowling alley.

3) Listening to the massive ovation from 70,000 people when the 15 Iraqi Special Olympians entered the stadium during the opening ceremonies.

4) Watching Mary Beth win a silver medal in bowling and on the podium put her arm around the gold medalist and cheer her.

I just thought I would share.

PeterH

Quid Pro Quo

My filmmaking career is heavily indebted to the deposits I have made into the favor bank and the interest those favors have accrued. It’s a pretty easy concept, you do something to help someone and they will help you in return. Maybe not today or tomorrow, but sometime, somehow. If they don’t return the favor, shame on them. It is sort of like karma and the mafia rolled into one.

The favor bank was a lesson I learned in college and I try to teach it to my students beginning day one. When I was a junior in college I was loaned Chicago Studio City (now Oprah’s Harpo Studios) for a weekend to shoot a music video. I had three stages (one of which held The Wild Kingdom set- I never saw Marlon Perkins or Jim Fowler) and all the toys that went along with those stages for the price of me stripping and waxing the Studio City lounge floor.

I have written here before about my work with Denny Dent. Denny worked for me for essentially a ride to the airport and copies of the finished work. He knew how the favor bank worked and was willing to spend an afternoon painting Mick Jagger for me on the hopes that it would turn out well and he could use it to further his career. It did- for both of us.

I am always amazed when students don’t buy into this concept. Recently I hooked up a former student of mine on a three day documentary shoot. There was no pay, but he would have his travel and meals comped, and more importantly, be able to take a camera credit on a feature length documentary. He was shooting concert footage of rockabilly legend Sleepy LaBeef jamming with Cheap Trick’s Rick Nielsen and that’s not a bad thing to have on your reel at age 25. If I had the time I probably could have found someone to pay ME for the opportunity to shoot this.

In any event when he returned from the the trip he called to complain, explaining he felt he deserved at least something for the effort, plus (and I think this is what really got him upset) he had to be a boom operator for part of the trip and he didn’t feel comfortable doing that. I told him I was sorry and to look at all the positives from the experience. I reminded him that he now had a deposit in his favor bank and at some point he can call it in.

I think he would have preferred a deposit into his regular bank, but for his sake I hope he learned a lesson about the ways of the business world.

PeterH

RSS
Follow by Email
Instagram